From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 3 12:07:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09684 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 12:07:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.125.27.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA09653 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 12:06:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA08083; Sat, 4 Apr 1998 00:04:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Message-ID: <19980404000425.64904@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 00:04:25 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: "Alok K. Dhir" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, adkin003@tc.umn.edu Subject: Re: Working patch *with* splhigh() (Was Re: More info RE: X slowdown in -current) Mail-Followup-To: Poul-Henning Kamp , "Alok K. Dhir" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, adkin003@tc.umn.edu References: <19980403233242.31917@nagual.pp.ru> <3267.891633132@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <3267.891633132@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Fri, Apr 03, 1998 at 09:52:12PM +0200 Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Apr 03, 1998 at 09:52:12PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > My xserver is remote, but it still doesn't make any difference :-( local xserver needed for testing. > >> Does "systat :vm" show abnormally many syscalls ? How many is 'abnormally many'? Maybe I'll send you just systat output so you can determine? > The problem is that time must somehow become zero when we reach > tsleep() where it should have been non-zero. I'd be damned if I > can see how that can happen. Do you know any place for debugging printf which just detect error and not overflow messages? I can insert it there and test. Or maybe temporarily use some sysctl variable... > Anybody else see this problem with version 1.35 ? This whole thread *is* about 1.35 version, if you start to read from first messages they are 'the code claimed to be fixed but I still got slowness'. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message