Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:23:54 +0000 (GMT) From: <jimmy@mammothcheese.ca> To: mark.linn@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jimmy@mammothcheese.ca Subject: Re: Re: non-blocking io, EINTR Message-ID: <1702965342.3351204151034722.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The author is just trying to make his reads and w rites robust.
The functions he has written have no kno= wledge whether or
not signals have been
set to interrupt system = calls, so he makes sure they test for
EINTR in case they
have been.
On Feb 27, 2008, mark.linn@gmail.com wro= te:
Thanks, E= d and James,
Then why in the world the sample code in this acm p= aper would
test
EINTR in read and write?
link is here.
[1]http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1350000/ 1344155/9815.html?key1=1344155&key2=2950393021&coll=GUIDE& ;dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618
References
1. 3D"http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1350000/1344155/9815.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1702965342.3351204151034722.JavaMail.mail>