From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 23:38:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CA037B401 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B470643F3F for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:38:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc52) with SMTP id <2003060706382005200mtpqve>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 06:38:20 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:38:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Matthew Dillon In-Reply-To: <200306061726.h56HQUiw026473@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: <20030606233358.Y15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030606024813.Y5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <200306061726.h56HQUiw026473@apollo.backplane.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 06:38:21 -0000 On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > There are two issues with a changeover to bind-9. First, the bind-9 > port does not properly install the new encrypted command/management > system (the equivalent to ndc in bind-8), Can you elaborate on this? What does the port do wrong, or what should it do differently? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection