Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:23:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 240398] -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 incorrectly warns about missing snprintf()
Message-ID:  <bug-240398-99-JPzJjYUYms@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-240398-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-240398-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240398

Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jilles@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #3 from Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> ---
I agree with the snprintf/vsnprintf part of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D207271&action=3Ddiff =
except
that the test should be for __POSIX_VISIBLE >=3D 199506 instead of __XSI_VI=
SIBLE
>=3D 500 since this is not an XSI extension.

The change to vfscanf/vscanf/vsscanf is redundant since __XSI_VISIBLE =3D=
=3D 600
already implies C99.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240398-99-JPzJjYUYms>