From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Oct  3  8:20:36 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D5A37B66C
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 08:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA40493;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200010031520.LAA40493@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SACK in FreeBSD TCP.
In-Reply-To: <39D9F3AC.1C9A1F14@elischer.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010021106090.29826-100000@achilles.silby.com>
	<39D9F3AC.1C9A1F14@elischer.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 07:56:44 -0700, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> said:

> What I think would be really cool would be a Vegas/new-reno/SACK
> implementation!

I'm not aware of anyone other than Larry Peterson who thinks that
Vegas was correct, never mind a good idea to implement.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message