From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jun 3 17:54:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from coffee.q9media.com (coffee.q9media.com [216.94.229.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0248637B405 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:54:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (vega.tct.net [216.94.230.13]) by coffee.q9media.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5413uL94683; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:03:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 20:54:32 -0400 Subject: Re: Removing __P() (was Re: whois(1) patch) From: Mike Barcroft To: Bruce Evans Cc: , Mike Heffner Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Organization: q9 media Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6/2/01 9:23 AM, Bruce Evans at bde@zeta.org.au wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote: > >> Does anyone have any objections to removing __P() and converting prototypes >> to ANSI C, as part of binary cleaning up/auditing? > > Yes. It subtracts value and gives more changes to audit. Sorry, I didn't state that question very clearly. I want to silence warnings with WARNS=2 enabled by converting some variables to const char *. Since I'm converting variables to ANSI C types, it makes no sense to care along the __P() support shims because it won't compile on K&R anyway. Am I correct in my assertion? Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message