From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 27 01:27:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC2916A41C for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCBB43D53 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so263909wri for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:27:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gk2yPNG4ouCEFW9xhGbpE+S4ZDRcmJvn92Noi3Gfp//mUxr6OGawASq6sTYii5ADIH9aGi0GoQfVyUgm9pUUfR6Qu1wuYu3h1w8dRO0UGegRFEnsiMDNAadUK+GTZpHFc1DczhiXQymNLM9Kam5+ZSu1eQ6GWK0A8EFXVmghD/g= Received: by 10.54.29.24 with SMTP id c24mr3028127wrc; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.2 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:27:14 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= In-Reply-To: <42BD41CC.70202@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050625112256.GA32433@lothlorien.nagual.st> <42BD41CC.70202@locolomo.org> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: upgrading all ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:27:15 -0000 On 6/25/05, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: >=20 > portupgrade isn't suitable for upgrading the entire machine, even though > you do recursive and Recursive. >=20 > It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from > ground up. And it is far more secure in not screwing up. >=20 > I recommend writing down a list of apps you need to be happy, deinstall > everything and then install those apps. Dependencies comes along fine, > and then whatever remains can be installed as needed. >=20 > Anyway, the worst that can happen is that you will screw up some user > app's - ok this is bad - but your system won't require a reinstall :-) >=20 > Cheers, Erik With Gnome, KDE, etc. I completely agree with you, portupgrade always manages fudge something up. What are some easy ways to do this... lets say for example I updated to gnome 2.12 what would be an easy (automated) way to remove all of Gnome 2.10 and all of my GTK apps without removing KDE and my QT apps?