Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:07:13 -0000 (GMT) From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@iol.ie> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rm with no arguments... Message-ID: <XFMail.990127160713.steveo@iol.ie> In-Reply-To: <199901271549.HAA26208@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27-Jan-99 Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> To add to this, Solaris, DEC UNIX and RedHat do not warn when "rm -f"
> is entered.
Not quite so simple
Solaris 2.4 warns on rm -f
Solaris 2.6 does not
Solaris 2.6 man page talks about xpg4 whereas the 2.4 man page makes no
mention of xpg4. However that man page also states that historical Solaris
behaviour is the norm and xpg4 compliance is in /usr/xpg4/bin so I suspect this
is a red herring.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@iol.ie>
Date: 27-Jan-99
Time: 16:01:08
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990127160713.steveo>