From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 20:42:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474B0106564A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9D38FC0C for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (207.47.0.2.static.nextweb.net [207.47.0.2]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 976958FC2B; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:42:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A58835C38; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:42:20 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: milki Message-Id: <20110316134220.d92eb20d.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110316160048.GM32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <1300272269.1973.16.camel@localhost> <20110316160048.GM32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: making Ruby 1.9 default X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:42:39 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:00:48 -0700 milki mentioned: > On 11:25 Wed 16 Mar , Eric wrote: > > There are plenty of outstanding PRs regarding portupgrade, which does seem > > to suffer from being both loved and unloved (in terms of maintenance). I > > personally use it, but am wondering if it's time to switch to Doug's > > PortMaster now... However given that portupgrade is often noted in > > documentation as almost the default tool for doing upgrades of ports then it > > does seem sensible that we should all try our best to fix it. > > I've been hanging out at #bsdports@efnet and I've gathered that is the > consensus of committers that portupgrade is no longer maintained and > portmaster is the preferred tool. The docs need some patching to reflect > this. > It's not true, it's officially maintained by ruby@, which for portupgrade was effectively mainly me for the past years. Unfortunately, I don't have enough resources to make significant changes there. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments