Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:16:58 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Chuck Tuffli <chuck_tuffli@agilent.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIM as loadable module? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211201231010.64851-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20021120195226.GA35733@cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Chuck Tuffli wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:16:06PM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 23:47:13 -0500, Long, Scott wrote: > > > > One question is whether the card gets probed when you statically compile > > the driver into the kernel. > > I haven't tried this yet. Maybe the question I'm asking is does the > CAM automatically scan new buses or is a scan initiated by camcontrol > for loadable modules. It gets scanned on boot. If you load a module, it does not start a rescan automatically although the periph drivers are notified by an async callback. > > Another is, what happens when you rescan that bus? (camcontrol devlist -v > > should show which SCSI bus is allocated to your driver.) > > smallrocks# camcontrol devlist -v > scbus0 on tach0 bus 0: > < > at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () > scbus1 on tach1 bus 0: > < > at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () > scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: > < > at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) This looks like it's attaching but the target id is invalid. Can you show your tach_attach routine where you set up the SIM and then register? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211201231010.64851-100000>