From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 19 23:21:02 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AA2887
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:21:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com
 [209.85.215.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A0E8FC12
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p9so1952789laa.4
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:21:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=gOUot/prfsyaZDiwtd+ZOOFhcOVEbAHfmMhWnK3gESY=;
 b=Zc+ePsiKzFh/lwi1+EWJHVmwLOdb4YojO8D+rglKm1iuZlw515XWjmDEhuyQNUAUvI
 BsYXRgJoLBKndXSlpH/Y8ito+sc8Ng6ZwbULa+TPAzkirhNzIWyaphKeSaXisUxUWkmi
 GRiGrUCjYJc2wWEd1eMjEnfnbhvL24s701m95F1hNxbE3znBrzcxpNHCP0d6+cVh1NLI
 rbqnxCyIJ1JtBiM9mjB4TqshVeJx+Hr8itlqQKfN9v/Hghxqt4CqDN/CVJDb1CmrrXrk
 7tibJD13f1k2k/u8BUIy4lvjnZlb3CovhMVWVq1ou06/x78eQ3nr7vcM0HNbFp/dZj0r
 gDSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.144.71 with SMTP id sk7mr6909178lab.29.1355959260348; Wed,
 19 Dec 2012 15:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.11.165 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:21:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1355957827076-5770897.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <CAFYkXj=KeM_tdJyPd_KAPg6D6eTgG5UVdraOfPu_Rc1gCDdTYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121219165047.GA56414@anubis.morrow.me.uk>
 <CAFYkXjmV1_3JoiUD1Z4bJpMca9W5jHDbWzXNwpbn=nYSSmtKcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1355957827076-5770897.post@n5.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:21:00 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yllKyTzXAkRoVJb9d_ohIHSs4Hk
Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=ny7QsAqZ+mtBWotDR2=0BYT7jhzf9P3uBoC-biN5hfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:21:02 -0000

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote:
> Prerelease was using -STABLE packages.

Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen
version of -stable when a release is made?

> Magic of enviroment variables...
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/packages-using.html

Yea, new tool PKG in 9.1 at last :-) :-)

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/pkgng-intro.html

Thanks Jakub! :-)

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info