From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 19:33:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EFA16A4DD for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA143D45 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9046D5E17; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C79C5E11; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7NJX9wQ078002; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:09 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Todorov @ Paladin" Message-ID: <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:10 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > previously chosen options for a port build? >=20 It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7K11qRfpzJluFF4RAmX1AJ9KtZT8OHYim8B/7PELDle+92bBFwCfaIMj GiLmqc1EIjl+rh8JjXX1w44= =cwIy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--