From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 28 23:12:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6216716A4B3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za (zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za
	[146.64.24.58])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0CD224401E; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jhay@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za)
Received: from zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	h8T6Bdqs064425;	Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:39 +0200 (SAST)
	(envelope-from jhay@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za)
Received: (from jhay@localhost)
	by zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8T6BcRD064424;
	Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:38 +0200 (SAST)
	(envelope-from jhay)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:38 +0200
From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za>
To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
Message-ID: <20030929061138.GF63554@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>
References: <20030920231352.GA34248@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030920231352.GA34248@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: sos@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ar device
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:12:08 -0000

> 
> 	Isn't it a bit incosistent to have two different
> devices called ar? (ar(4) and ar ataraid array from ata(4)).
> What would happen if one has both ar ataraid array and
> Digi/Arnet card? atacontrol ar0, ifconfig ar1? ;)

I did complain when the ataraid stuff was committed.

John
-- 
John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org