Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:38 +0200 From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl> Cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ar device Message-ID: <20030929061138.GF63554@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20030920231352.GA34248@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <20030920231352.GA34248@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Isn't it a bit incosistent to have two different > devices called ar? (ar(4) and ar ataraid array from ata(4)). > What would happen if one has both ar ataraid array and > Digi/Arnet card? atacontrol ar0, ifconfig ar1? ;) I did complain when the ataraid stuff was committed. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929061138.GF63554>