From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 03:00:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215AF106566B for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FF88FC12 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o28303nB011299; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:00:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=casselton.net; s=ccnMail; t=1268017203; bh=YU91a4NdBx7M28HnX+gdO2ZSe87T9dkbR7A2I44OOqM=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To; b=JDcdUy/TvzhBUOBRtusN53LYuP0y9JJB/6XPMLm3HCesdMMQNTDJ+Ttsnzal8i6wA DqsYXeGXJGIL68BenSvkXRBeqIQo90Z06pzeHryKPH2H2PgV/XCcHskHtzXjACmIrJ eTa7KMLLfO77U0yFuHwMQB6WRQfU6Mt3WAFSXUO0= Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id o28303CD011298; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:00:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:00:03 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net> To: ticso@cicely.de In-Reply-To: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.2 (casselton.net [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:00:03 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:00:06 -0000 > It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds. > This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles. > Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are > mostly some instructions longer. > But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200. > > -- > B.Walter http://www.bwct.de > Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user mode? --Mark Tinguely