From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Aug 24 08:40:08 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B839BFDC6
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E40092B
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t7O8e8Jd009515
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:40:08 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 202614] [EFI] boot/loader.efi: Fix and improve the 'nvram'
 command
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:40:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-202614-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:40:08 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202614

            Bug ID: 202614
           Summary: [EFI] boot/loader.efi: Fix and improve the 'nvram'
                    command
           Product: Base System
           Version: 11.0-CURRENT
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: kern
          Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com

Created attachment 160296
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160296&action=edit
patch-sys-boot-efi-loader-main.c

Hi,

The embedded 'nvram' command of loader.efi (-CURRENT, r286279) fails to list
EFI variables with the following message :

??=<error retrieving variable>

Find attached a patch that brings the following :

- Fix variables enumeration (to initiate the search, the 'VariableName'
argument of GetNextVariableName() should be a pointer to NULL, not a NULL
pointer [1])
- Add a '-v' (verbose) option to display variables' contents (now hidden by
default, as the output is un-readable with too many variables)
- Add the ability to specify a variable name to restrict display to variable(s)
matching this name only
- Print GUID along with each variable name
- Simplify contents' rendering by *always* printing them in hex (most of the
contents were un-readable in ascii)

Best Regards,
Ganael.

[1] UEFI Specification Version v2.5, p239:
http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI%202_5.pdf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.