From owner-freebsd-hubs Tue Nov 19 6: 6:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D49F37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:06:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from veil.qala.com.sg (veil.qala.com.sg [210.193.2.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F2843E3B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mirror-maintainer@mirror.averse.net) Received: from spam.averse.net (mirror [210.193.6.237] (may be forged)) by veil.qala.com.sg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gAJE6GA00075 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:06:16 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:06:31 +0800 (SGT) From: mirror-maintainer@mirror.averse.net X-X-Sender: pyng@spam.averse.net Cc: freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2/i386 bits on ftp-master In-Reply-To: <200211190903.gAJ93Dqg065905@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Oliver Fromme wrote: > PS: Maybe it would be a good idea to create some CGI for > mirror maintainers for feedback, instead of spamming the > -hubs list with "ftpX.yz has it!" messages? Just an idea. > However, it would probably be non-trivial to authenticate > the feedback. I see no need to authenticate "ftpX.cc has it!" style feedback; it's not presently authenticated on this mailing list anyway. Perhaps an alternate workaround is to simply ask all replying maintainers to write directly to the person asking for the info. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message