Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:01:48 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: shebangfix for /bin/sh Message-ID: <20140326160147.GG4402@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFFB%2BpSWEhbaSB3wyuV_JFcu93S-7nHWjQxkyR-Lv5w8tYdYwQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFFB%2BpTnbZZ3rzxyz8JX_F4VQ8yh3FPRO3r%2B9myB=yBWq4FegA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFB%2BpRmypLz%2BCfgRR%2BfHHaavuXOKJ-1FUYgZ9YNqryxKCh66g@mail.gmail.com> <20140325134850.GD4402@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAFFB%2BpSWEhbaSB3wyuV_JFcu93S-7nHWjQxkyR-Lv5w8tYdYwQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wr= ote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org>= wrote: > >> > Hi All- > >> > > >> > I am in the process of cleaning up sysutils/DTraceToolkit and I would > >> > like to make use of USES=3Dshebangfix > >> > > >> > However, it looks like on solaris, sh is /usr/bin/sh so I would like > >> > to propose the following change: > >> > > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~skreuzer/patches/shebang.patch > >> > >> Can someone from portmgr chime in on this? I would like to get it comm= itted so > >> I can commit some changes to sysutils/DTraceToolkit > >> > >> Thanks > > > > How many ports are concerned? > > if just one there is no need to add this into shebangfix.mk >=20 > So far I have only seen this in one port. I am not sure how widespread it= is. > However, it looks like this is a solaris-ism so it seems like we should j= ust > include it as part of shebangfix instead of doing it in just that one por= t. >=20 > If you guys disagree, I will just do it in the port. >=20 I disagree, I prefer it be be done in a couple of ports and if the number of ports using that is growing then we can merge it into the infra. regards, Bapt --vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlMy+eoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzwfwCfX/IG1Jyqq7isNCZVYpjDR90O xA4AoLkFSRFhnxCkNX/HS0FH1oEdWCRN =YRAD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vJguvTgX93MxBIIe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140326160147.GG4402>