From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 16:14:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF15106566B; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 16:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672628FC0A; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 16:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sa-nc-cs-116.static.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q97GEIRG060706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:14:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <201210070701.q977170a033550@red.freebsd.org> <201210070710.q977A9p8087371@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: Max Khon , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar , "Simon J. Gerraty" Subject: Re: misc/172440: [patch] [build] fix broken CTFCONVERT_CMD call X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:14:20 -0000 On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:48 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Please don't use WITH_BMAKE. It's only added for handling the switch. The option will be removed soon. BTW: Isn't it easier to introduce a CC_CMD variable that contains at least the compile command and to which you can append any commands you want? Not only does that eliminate the problem at hand, it also makes the whole think a lot less like a one-off hack, and more like a fundamental feature. Other things we may want to do after we compile a file is generate API/ABI information that we can validate so that we can fail the build when some code change breaks the ABI or API. Thoughts? -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net