From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 14 14:45:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A6137BC11; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:45:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA67077; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:45:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA39245; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:45:31 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007142145.PAA39245@harmony.village.org> To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: SysctlFS Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:48:05 +0200." <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> References: <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> <20000712144510.A11316@ywing.creative.net.au> <200007130537.WAA29614@apollo.backplane.com> <20000714112117.D17372@ywing.creative.net.au> <20000714053540.A30847@holly.calldei.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:45:31 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> Adrian Chadd writes: : As I said in my previous email, persistence isn't the primary problem : in my eyes. There are many ways people can handle it. What I see as being : an interesting problem is handling devfs across multiple process/group : namespaces (jail/chroot) without cluttering up your mount table. Yes. Another issue is the new hot plug devices. It is highly desirable to allow arbitrary commands to run when they come and go. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message