Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:33 -0500 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openoffice --- document disclosure Message-ID: <4147B015.7000408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4147AEF4.8090700@FreeBSD.org> References: <20040914022410.GA83483@madman.celabo.org> <20040915.064258.730550294.chat95@mac.com> <20040914232905.GD95323@madman.celabo.org> <20040915.113702.607953676.chat95@mac.com> <4147AEF4.8090700@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques Vidrine wrote:
> NAKATA Maho wrote:
>
>> In Message-ID: <20040914232905.GD95323@madman.celabo.org> "Jacques A.
>> Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear nectar and portmgr:
>>
>> Dear portmgr:
>> o I forgot to bump PORTREVISION
>> o I should change VuXML entry < 1.1.2_1 Please approve!
>> thank you very much!
>>
>> Dear nectar:
>>
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.165
>> diff -u -r1.165 Makefile
>> --- Makefile 14 Sep 2004 22:20:51 -0000 1.165
>> +++ Makefile 15 Sep 2004 02:35:18 -0000
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>
>> PORTNAME= openoffice
>> PORTVERSION= 1.1.2
>> +PORTREVISION= 1
>> CATEGORIES+= editors
>> MASTER_SITES+=
>> ${MASTER_SITE_RINGSERVER:S,%SUBDIR%,misc/openoffice/&,} \
>>
>> ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/OpenOffice/%SUBDIR%/ \
>>
>> cvs server: Diffing .
>> Index: vuln.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml,v
>> retrieving revision 1.218
>> diff -u -r1.218 vuln.xml
>> --- vuln.xml 14 Sep 2004 03:38:59 -0000 1.218
>> +++ vuln.xml 15 Sep 2004 02:36:34 -0000
>> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
>> <name>tr-openoffice</name>
>> <name>zh-openoffice-CN</name>
>> <name>zh-openoffice-TW</name>
>> - <range><ge>0</ge></range>
>> + <range><ge>1.1.2_1</ge></range>
>> </package>
>> </affects>
>> <description>
>> cvs server: Diffing files
>>
>> is sufficient?
>
>
> Yes, I think that will be just fine.
My mistake, I did not read carefully enough. The correct thing I
believe (and what I will commit) is
<range><lt>1.1.2_1</lt></range>
<range><ge>2.0</ge></range>
In other words, the affected versions are X < 1.1.2_1 or X >= 2.0.
Cheers,
--
Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio
nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4147B015.7000408>