From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 09:32:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0441065674 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293A8FC1D for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88F46B80; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:32:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:32:56 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Vadim Goncharov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080305093215.H4227@fledge.watson.org> References: <20080303185618.M63813@shell.xecu.net> <47CC9CD9.9030107@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:32:57 -0000 On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6 required > for SCTP in 7.0?': > >>> I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now. >>> >>> When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the >>> kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh 7.0-STABLE source, here's the >>> error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled): >> Yes, INET6 is (currently) required if you enable SCTP. > > Will it be fixed? Any time soon? It's considered a bug, and hopefully it will be fixed by the SCTP maintainers soon. However, they've been fairly busy with another project so I'm not sure there's a specific timeline. I would like to see it fixed by 7.1. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge