From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 14:52:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A47E1065675; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FB68FC1E; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q55Eq9LE059095; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:52:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q55Eq80T059094; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:52:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201206051452.q55Eq80T059094@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mark Linimon , Erich , Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Chris Rees , Chris Nehren In-Reply-To: <20120604051919.GC32597@lonesome.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.9.6-20101126 ("Burnside") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:52:25 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:52:31 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > The current status is that we support 8.x and 9.x well. Ports support > for 7.x is starting to fade over time as new upstream releases rely > on newer APIs. 6.x went EOL 11/30/2010 and we no longer claim to > support it in ports. FWIW ... In fact, I can confirm that the ports don't support 6.x anymore since last week. :-) # cd /usr/ports/dns/bind96 # make No closing parenthesis in archive specification "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 177: Error in archive specification: "WITH_" No closing parenthesis in archive specification "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 177: Error in archive specification: "WITH_" make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "C++ is the only current language making COBOL look good." -- Bertrand Meyer