From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Nov 2 14:33:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4A453758 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CPwPw57Xyz4bdH for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AE6C945353C; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE277453279 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CPwPv6MWlz4bb4 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id e18so3401304edy.6 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 06:33:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=jT+0E8XEyK3mXoxPyviYBSeTCdSnyDuZbieOYfXjS4E=; b=VO/zEeQSDIJU8U1G02Kmh/i6/OJRaPxABSeWmhkEETgXjwD168gSPcQ2I7CH4+2w5B XXa/ckYx6qoY5LeZPhywezGhSQAffScyl05BxWgMFzVmRtHlb2aE9mvRizw2TCyKvWy8 pFqwZEMKbpEW/Z8ggAKa75V4hQ2qYTf0ym8LVS5A8LHJ3LErmdOxbeouejRmDH9f6taQ MN8JmfKt7C+xuf+J/9yg/H74XuiKmZpiI5NV/qT/yqrUe1Yd7+TdEhmJw24g6aaJJdVY jQW0LJKYJwFlgm303I5PuXz0/IM06GXlMGms0ukHiM7EQuO8xVL2p/1saYtvZSw4HHrx 86zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qB4G1JhwnCvD64ZIaJn3wzM63rNA4oXlGVqZXbwiQpxEaJLtf kqjV814Y9dzQx4Aaz9C8ODbvjsWCMFo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxt5uassH5LDY9Fj9kcZEKW7mvIji+M3Zpf1Jn0dPJl5C9d4hRkRkJ/F+Jqw0ALf5eCQpGbOw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9319:: with SMTP id m25mr2454158eda.297.1604327602172; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 06:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8? ([2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm10420623edu.74.2020.11.02.06.33.21 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Nov 2020 06:33:21 -0800 (PST) To: "ports@freebsd.org" From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: What are the benefits of NO_ARCH? Message-ID: <823586a7-dfd7-55b2-a7d3-0775a1f2533f@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:33:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CPwPv6MWlz4bb4 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mpp302@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpp302@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.930]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.009]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.03)[0.034]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.45:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.45:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:33:24 -0000 Hi ports@, I wonder if setting NO_ARCH=yes brings any significant benefits to how our ports collection works. I'd be grateful if you could shed some light on the importance of setting NO_ARCH whenever possible. Thanks, Mateusz