Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:28:50 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-bugbusters <freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: per-user send-pr defaults: ~/.send-pr.rc?
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291122080.2417-100000@pancho>
In-Reply-To: <20040429143623.GM10877@submonkey.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote:

> I'm slightly uncomfortable with allowing users to specify a default
> priority and severity, but those fields are becoming useless anyway so
> this may not be too much of an issue - I need to think about that a bit.

Many people assign unsuitable values to these fields.  Unless someone
wants to do some kind of enforcement effort (code to say "if Foo says
it, it's really a priority, if Bar says it, it's not") these fields
should just be suppressed.

DES has argued that they are meaningless at this point and should just
be dropped.  I disagreed with him when he last posted it but at this
point I've changed my mind -- the time spent trying to bring sense to
the current state of these fields in the database would be much better
spent just fixing the PRs.

The only alternative I would see is to go through and reset everything
to, e.g., non-critical, and start enforcing people to choose appropriate
values as they come in.  I'm not volunteering for this, I have too many
other projects, and unless someone comes forward pretty quickly to do
something like that, I'd just say drop 'em.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291122080.2417-100000>