From nobody Sat Jan 25 16:55:23 2025
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YgLXn1fHKz5lcGT
	for <freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:00:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YgLXm3B9Bz4JVv
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	dkim=none;
	spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:14f8:200:4::4 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of pi@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=pi@freebsd.org;
	dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none)
Received: from pi (uid 104)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
	id de69
	by fc.opsec.eu (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13+ on fc.opsec.eu);
	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:55:23 +0100
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:55:23 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: which rc.conf syntax for vlans ? if.N or vlanN ?
Message-ID: <Z5UXe2gmwuZcWfX7@fc.opsec.eu>
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.85 / 15.00];
	VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[];
	SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
	NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000];
	NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985];
	NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.967];
	ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[];
	RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[];
	DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pi];
	R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c];
	FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
	MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org];
	TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]
X-Spamd-Bar: +
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4YgLXm3B9Bz4JVv

Hi!

Until around FreeBSD 13.2, one could create vlans with this:

cloned_interfaces="vlan200"
ifconfig_vlan200="vlandev ix0 vlan 200 inet 192.168.10.1/24"

Around 14.x, this changed:

vlans_ix0="200"
ifconfig_ix0_200="inet 192.168.10.1/24"

Will both variants be supported in the future (14, 15) or is one
of them on it's way out ?

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?