From eugen@grosbein.net Thu Jun 9 10:45:58 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405EF85EDEA for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LJgkJ1f7sz4tpM for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@[62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 259Ak6mi013425 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:46:07 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: marklmi@yahoo.com Received: from [10.58.0.11] (dadvw [10.58.0.11] (may be forged)) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 259Ak5xo046639 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:46:05 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Any clue why "df -m" vs. "du -xsAm" get such different results for the tmpfs in question (403 MiBytes vs. 101 MiBytes)? To: Mark Millard , FreeBSD Hackers References: <4997AB05-8CD4-4A2C-AAB3-34F6DB2CE325.ref@yahoo.com> <4997AB05-8CD4-4A2C-AAB3-34F6DB2CE325@yahoo.com> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <82ffa6bb-5826-62b6-2b82-a735b183272f@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:45:58 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4997AB05-8CD4-4A2C-AAB3-34F6DB2CE325@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available. * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LJgkJ1f7sz4tpM X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net does not designate 2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.15 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.995]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.76)[-0.759]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 09.06.2022 2:54, Mark Millard wrote: > Why 403 vs. 101 ? lsof +aL1 $mountpoint