From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 08:06:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6416A41F for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5C343D49 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:06:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so630660nzd for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:06:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=VNGH0erNpMyVM0bLTQeMia/oKuSiY/9d6WKT5IeTUXFSGK5maE37TY85+7+uiG02g+qTaBYyvn8/hiS4c+PMmE5MC59D1r7UZINrgZAIZXCCQ4fHdhCDu3GSgj0NY2fzhkoFJQwvZcj+ZXYZGZTDiyopyjKyW/VPb+tUsOXNZzU= Received: by 10.65.240.5 with SMTP id s5mr9444391qbr; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:06:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.81.14 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:06:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0511260006o156e9d81o6853e9c0a1e3b183@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:06:25 -0500 From: Chad Gross To: doc@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: cvsup-advanced article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:06:26 -0000 This: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/cvsup-advanced/examples= .htmlarticle is somewhat ambiguous. I am not quite clear on whether or not one has to mv checkouts.cvs:RELEASE_WHATEVER to checkouts.cvs:. for ports-all before doing a second cvsup. It explains that one must do this for src-all but it is not obvious to me if the same thing needs to be done for ports-all. Can someone clarify this please? Chad