From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 16 00:19:43 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8551E16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:19:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFE843D2D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:19:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113])
	by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j0G0W75B022449;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:32:07 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <41E9B316.6090402@fer.hr>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:19:34 +0100
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <41E9B02B.5070602@fer.hr>
	<20050116000935.GA95376@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050116000935.GA95376@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cannot su?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:19:43 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:07:07AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:

>>/etc/pam.d/su is identical to another machine where everything works ok.
> 
> You forgot to mention what version (4.x doesn't use /etc/pam.d)

oops. 5.3-release.