From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jan 23 20:33:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCDDA8FF23; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0A510D7; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5195765; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A9B5481E4; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:33:05 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Julian Elischer , FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HPN and None options in OpenSSH References: <86mvrxvg79.fsf@desk.des.no> <56A2DE54.6070603@freebsd.org> <861t98e1el.fsf@desk.des.no> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:33:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Oberman's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:15:36 -0800") Message-ID: <86wpr0c9z2.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:33:06 -0000 Kevin Oberman writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Julian Elischer writes: > > > what is the internal window size in the new ssh? > > 64 kB. > Are you sure of this? Sorry, I was thinking of 6.6 (in stable/10). The buffer code in 7.1 supports dynamically-sized buffers with a hard limit of 128 MB. The default window size for client sessions is 2 MB, or 1 MB if associated with a tty. I'm not sure what the maximum size is. Note that scp, sftp etc. count as client sessions. X11 and agent forwarding use different (smaller) windows which improve latency at the cost of throughput. > [...] scp still performed poorly when compared to other technologies scp is a horrible protocol, use sftp or (preferably) rsync over ssh. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no