From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 20:43:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FD4B15755 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DD61E13 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4766733C28; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:43:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Brandon J. Wandersee Cc: Lowell Gilbert , "William A. Mahaffey III" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports upgrade .... References: <571684CD.2070800@hiwaay.net> <44oa95crg1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <86d1pl2w7g.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:43:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86d1pl2w7g.fsf@WorkBox.Home> (Brandon J. Wandersee's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:13:39 -0500") Message-ID: <44h9excosl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:43:44 -0000 Brandon J. Wandersee writes: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > >> "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: >> >>> It brought down almost 14K updates for 3-ish weeks .... I know the >>> ports effort is a feverish hive of productivity, but that sounded a >>> bit high :-) .... Is that number anomalous, maybe coincident w/ new >>> quarter, something else ? More question than problem, but curious. TIA >>> & have a good one. >> >> If you're switching from one quarterly branch to the next, then sure, >> you've pretty much got three months worth of updates at once. > > I thought portsnap couldn't fetch from the quarterly branches? Or did my > caffeine-starved brain just misread something? :P Or I could just be wrong. I took a quick look at the documentation and the code and I'm not sure.