From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed May 16 10:53:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A719937B422
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dg@root.com)
Received: (from dg@localhost)
	by root.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f4GHmL968635;
	Wed, 16 May 2001 10:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dg)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:48:21 -0700
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dual fxp ethernet, one doesn't "work"
Message-ID: <20010516104821.A19893@nexus.root.com>
References: <15105.44534.131385.573668@onceler.kciLink.com> <x78zjx9oww.fsf@onceler.kciLink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <x78zjx9oww.fsf@onceler.kciLink.com>; from khera@kcilink.com on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:36:31PM -0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>>> "VK" == Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> writes:
>
>VK> Box name "m02":
>
>VK> [m02]% ifconfig -a
>VK> fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>VK>         inet 192.168.200.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.200.255
>VK>         ether 00:b0:d0:e1:34:de 
>VK>         media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
>VK>         supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
>VK> fxp1: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>VK>         inet 192.168.100.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
>VK>         ether 00:b0:d0:e1:34:df 
>VK>         media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active
>VK>         supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
>VK> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
>VK>         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 
>
>Ok... more data.  It is definitely a FreeBSD problem with dual fxp
>NICs.
>
>Evidence:
>
>I swapped the cables and IP numbers for fxp1 and fxp0.  Now, fxp1
>works and fxp0 doesn't.  That is, the interface I assign to
>192.168.100.2 doesn't work, but the one assinged 192.168.200.64 works
>fine.  The order in which they are assigned doesn't matter.
>
>Is there some magic to the 192.168.100.2 address?

   Can you provide us with the output of 'netstat -rna'?

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com
Pave the road of life with opportunities.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message