From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 05:57:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC0D98C0D1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8758D15E2 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [88.151.27.41] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z80AC-0005jJ-LG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:57:28 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z80AB-0004T6-GJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:57:27 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:57:27 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any utils worth installing a GUI on a server for? Message-Id: <20150625065727.e728118a09a939f408ec8526@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com> References: <558B3F60.7060809@sneakertech.com> <558B41A3.1050506@gmail.com> <558B45C1.3040101@sneakertech.com> <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 24227@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:57:33 -0000 On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:09:56 -0600 jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/24/2015 06:05 PM, Quartz wrote: > >> Yes. > >> If the storage on the server, then a gui tool > >> to manage the storage (drive replacement, > >> raid reconfiguration, drive additions .... etc. > >> It could make such tasks a lot easier. > > > > Well, is there such a thing for zfs? > > > :) > You said for server. > A raid has nothing to do with the FS type, > be it ext[N], NTFS, fat32, UFS, HFS+, ...etc. ZFS combines filesystem and storage management and is best used directly on drives or partitions and not on top of a RAID controller or other software RAID, so in this case the FS type does have a lot to do with the storage management. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith