From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 15:25:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907F56A9; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5D18FC08; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr129166.localdomain (mr129166.cri.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.129.166]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B20C2A6AD; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:25:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mr129166 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr129166.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C9765EA; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:25:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:25:31 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily Message-ID: <20121123162531.66bedee3@mr129166> In-Reply-To: <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl> <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org> <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org> <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166> <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:25:34 -0000 Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:31:06 +0200, Andriy Gapon a écrit : Hello, > >>> I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be > >>> able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.1. > >>> I'll send you a patch later. > >>> > >> > >> The patch: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfs-vfs.4.diff > > > > It does not apply on 9.1 RC-3. > > > > I've got a similar problem. > > With the same backtrace of init? I dont know, it's a remote server without KVM. I just can test if it improves the shutdown. > Willem massaged the patch to apply to stable/9 and promised to share > his patch. Cool, thanks. I've applied your previous patch (#3, I think) to 9.1 with few modifications but a quick test doing a "poudriere bulk" (lot of ZFS mount/rollback) shows that the system quickly becomes instable. I didn't find the time to dig into this. I will try the patch from Willem. Thanks, regards.