Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:25:31 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily Message-ID: <20121123162531.66bedee3@mr129166> In-Reply-To: <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl> <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org> <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org> <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166> <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:31:06 +0200, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> a écrit : Hello, > >>> I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be > >>> able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.1. > >>> I'll send you a patch later. > >>> > >> > >> The patch: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfs-vfs.4.diff > > > > It does not apply on 9.1 RC-3. > > > > I've got a similar problem. > > With the same backtrace of init? I dont know, it's a remote server without KVM. I just can test if it improves the shutdown. > Willem massaged the patch to apply to stable/9 and promised to share > his patch. Cool, thanks. I've applied your previous patch (#3, I think) to 9.1 with few modifications but a quick test doing a "poudriere bulk" (lot of ZFS mount/rollback) shows that the system quickly becomes instable. I didn't find the time to dig into this. I will try the patch from Willem. Thanks, regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121123162531.66bedee3>