Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:57:47 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian <aanton@spintech.ro> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw core dump Message-ID: <412F13AB.6050801@spintech.ro> In-Reply-To: <20040827200714.C90788@Neo-Vortex.Ath.Cx> References: <20040827002100.GB653@vista.netmemetic.com> <6917b781040826185127c7b744@mail.gmail.com> <20040827154731.G78094@Neo-Vortex.Ath.Cx> <412EF6F7.9000900@spintech.ro> <20040827200714.C90788@Neo-Vortex.Ath.Cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Neo-Vortex wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > > >>Yes, it would be nice if you could also attach the ipfw.core file. > > > he he, you think hes stupid? core files can contain sensative > information... also it would be pointless unless we had the exact same > binary as he had with the same libraries (well, not entirely pointless, > but easier for him to do it :P) > > No i was not thinking of anything unethical. He could have inspected the .core file before sending it. However, I doubt an ipfw core file would contain sensitive information (like passwords and etc). What could it contain, the ACL? The ACL is not secret and who cares anyway? I'm just interested in possible firewall bugs. Yours, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Spintech Systems GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412F13AB.6050801>