From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 28 14:09:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29890 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:09:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29881 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:09:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@unixhelp.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA03406; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 17:09:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 17:09:04 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Feldman X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Phillip Salzman cc: gmarco@giovannelli.it, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wanton Atticizing is bad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 Dec 1998, Phillip Salzman wrote: > > > > You can do that with natd. > > That is possible, but not logical. Say you have 2000 > dialup users attempting to access the web at the same time... all > coming from different IP addresses -- would you want the packet > scanning to go at the Cisco, or at the NATd? Its simple to do > a transparent proxy from the cisco, and does not require too much on > the squid side (IPFILTER), with less on the router. I meant that natd could be used along with squid and ipfw divert, handling the packet translation and forwarding/reception. > > -- > Phillip Salzman > Brian Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ green@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message