Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:37:18 -0400 From: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: shebangfix for /bin/sh Message-ID: <CAFFB%2BpQdWLnh2_4ot-o=KzN5mH4JMosuCL7EtAqaf5Uo6T0yjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140326160147.GG4402@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <CAFFB%2BpTnbZZ3rzxyz8JX_F4VQ8yh3FPRO3r%2B9myB=yBWq4FegA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFB%2BpRmypLz%2BCfgRR%2BfHHaavuXOKJ-1FUYgZ9YNqryxKCh66g@mail.gmail.com> <20140325134850.GD4402@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAFFB%2BpSWEhbaSB3wyuV_JFcu93S-7nHWjQxkyR-Lv5w8tYdYwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140326160147.GG4402@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi All- >> >> > >> >> > I am in the process of cleaning up sysutils/DTraceToolkit and I would >> >> > like to make use of USES=shebangfix >> >> > >> >> > However, it looks like on solaris, sh is /usr/bin/sh so I would like >> >> > to propose the following change: >> >> > >> >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~skreuzer/patches/shebang.patch >> >> >> >> Can someone from portmgr chime in on this? I would like to get it committed so >> >> I can commit some changes to sysutils/DTraceToolkit >> >> >> >> Thanks >> > >> > How many ports are concerned? >> > if just one there is no need to add this into shebangfix.mk >> >> So far I have only seen this in one port. I am not sure how widespread it is. >> However, it looks like this is a solaris-ism so it seems like we should just >> include it as part of shebangfix instead of doing it in just that one port. >> >> If you guys disagree, I will just do it in the port. >> > I disagree, I prefer it be be done in a couple of ports and if the number of > ports using that is growing then we can merge it into the infra. Sounds like a plan. Thanks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFFB%2BpQdWLnh2_4ot-o=KzN5mH4JMosuCL7EtAqaf5Uo6T0yjw>