From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 1 14:46:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049F016A4CE; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:46:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BE143D31; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (dwmalone@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j01EkQof069864; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:46:26 GMT (envelope-from dwmalone@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from dwmalone@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j01EkQBd069860; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:46:26 GMT (envelope-from dwmalone) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:46:26 GMT From: David Malone Message-Id: <200501011446.j01EkQBd069860@freefall.freebsd.org> To: yuri@tsoft.com, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/75702: -O5 flag breaks some compiles in /usr/src/lib/libc X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:46:27 -0000 Synopsis: -O5 flag breaks some compiles in /usr/src/lib/libc State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: dwmalone State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 1 14:43:55 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Though Simon is correct, that we do not support optimisation settings other than -O and -O2, the warning listed in the PR is a constness warning that we can probably fix. I'm interested in doing that, so I'll take the PR. David. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->dwmalone Responsible-Changed-By: dwmalone Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 1 14:43:55 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Though Simon is correct, that we do not support optimisation settings other than -O and -O2, the warning listed in the PR is a constness warning that we can probably fix. I'm interested in doing that, so I'll take the PR. David. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=75702