Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:15:08 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> References: <D029D964D3A96A570922090C@ogg.in.absolight.net> <ee422bd630292fe6f7bc5439799667de@lhaven.homeip.net> <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <B5BC1F9B1E9B32C89F11B397@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+--On 13 janvier 2015 19:11:50 -0800 Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: |> The dialog option you talk about says: |> [ ] REPLACE_BASE EOL, no longer supported |> I'm quite sure the end-user you're talking about can get a clue from it, |> and if he either already had selected it before, or he just selected it, |> he will get: |> ===> bind99-9.9.6P1_3 REPLACE_BASE is no longer supported. |> The end-user can then get another clue and maybe unselect it. | | Maybe you're right but, to perhaps better illustrate the point, you would | never see something like this in Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat, or SuSE. Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it again. -- Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?507F8738895177F5640A4090>