From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 09:16:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4230721; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0DF2BD1; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n9so5097930qcw.1 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:16:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EfQhv53oWCc33jHH8gkqNXbrytLakkLyf54xoeqES+Y=; b=Na57bdFudnbHSg7QBsh6AlsG164uTGsd1yNme9ryYX2X1PkchVJA/Srg8dbwSEJD5D zopGxc2gpGAgD91nvrK/4K0LoomSXMDh85GwJa8K93bUYR+ogY6aFLbtlBqS08J1SFXi wp9VtMbb82+xKH/TR644o5XTCS8KTDBHz27MDdpnYXthpT6/UYbDNbyKnosLT5iXMgho 8mCmYc2zBw5u9CWq1uWA7muhujoOa5HA2XraAREyYoWmFBdybcqJIBGXKABbyGuvG03e 6qUetFDH2TcdWZhH2GIXVNwWVhIROLqkpWVErHiOPbO5MHlN4z+O1LCaTDOtYP3KGw/0 fWcg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.50.38 with SMTP id z6mr32623268qen.30.1384247786870; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.180.233 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:16:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: freebsd-version(1) enchancement From: Kimmo Paasiala To: FreeBSD current , des@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:16:28 -0000 I didn't even know this tool existed before tried to complete freebsd- today, very nice. Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system sources in the version output? Maybe with a separate option (-u perhaps?) if it's not ok to change the meaning of -k and -u options anymore. -Kimmo