From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 6 14:23:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from voi.aagh.net (pc1-hart4-0-cust168.mid.cable.ntl.com [62.254.84.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAEF37B402 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16NLhe-000Jq5-00 for arch@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2002 22:23:42 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:23:42 +0000 From: Thomas Hurst To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make(1) enhancement - an 'environment processor' option Message-ID: <20020106222342.GA76079@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20011225202925.F304@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20020106222002.E314@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020106222002.E314@straylight.oblivion.bg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: Not much. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.5-PRERELEASE (i386) X-Uptime: 10:16PM up 17 days, 7:01, 3 users, load averages: 2.04, 2.05, 2.01 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote: > No feedback on this proposed change to make(1)? :) Personally I think this is something that should be handled by ports rather than make; can it's functionality not be added to bsd.port.mk or so? -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/ - We have only two things to worry about: That things will never get back to normal, and that they already have. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message