From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Sat Aug 4 04:42:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AE5105DD60; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 04:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1CAF84C53; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 04:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (124-169-199-167.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.169.199.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w744gjGG049325 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Aug 2018 21:42:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Archives of last quarterly package builds? To: Kurt Jaeger , grarpamp Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34cb48da-1f15-1610-966d-1e30314f7665@freebsd.org> <20180803031744.GH2118@home.opsec.eu> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 12:42:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180803031744.GH2118@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 04:42:51 -0000 On 3/8/18 11:17 am, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> I've asked for this but the answer is >>> "no we don't do that.. and have no plans to". >> What is the rationale? > I don't know, but as the setup of your own package builder box > is simple enough -- wouldn't that be an alternative for you ? If the answer is always "don't use the quarterly packages but create your own, then why have them at all?" Think about it.. Every three months we spend time adding bug fixes and stability fixes to a branch. then just as it's getting good..    we delete all the pkgs.  It makes no sense at all.