From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 9 14:53:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03357 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 14:53:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03352 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 14:53:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA02835; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 07:53:21 +1000 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 07:53:21 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199807092153.HAA02835@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: imp@village.org, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/msgs msgs.c Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >: We haven't been using POSIX saved uids for more than two years now IIRC... >: >: kern.saved_ids: 0 > >Yes. That's one of the hazards of importing fixes wholesale from >OpenBSD. They do have saved ids, and they have needed to fix things >in a posixly correct way. A POSIXly correct way would handle all possible settings of _POSIX_SAVED_IDS. Configuration for the case where _POSIX_SAVED_IDS is set is difficult because the configuring entity must read the system documentation to determine what "appropriate privilege" means and generate code to handle any mismatches between the system's idea of appropriate privilege and what the application expects :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message