From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 9 00:38:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD26516A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:38:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0B3C43D1D for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:38:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 99885 invoked by uid 1252); 9 Jun 2004 00:38:11 -0000 Date: 8 Jun 2004 20:38:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:38:11 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20040609003811.GC72578@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040608175318.GY72578@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040608185934.GB72578@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need feedback/review, a big change in AbiWord2 port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:38:12 -0000 >> (06.08.2004 @ 1513 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 3.8K: << > >>>> - Change the default spell from Enchant to Aspell, because it doesn't > >>>> work at all unless you compile Enchant with the Aspell support. I > >>>> think, it's waste to depend on Enchant by default. > >>>> > >>>> Also, I have removed the check of Enchant. I prefer to see force > >>>> user to want use Enchant if they know what to do with it. I need > >>>> the > >>>> help on write the better comment in @${ECHO_CMD} about this. > >>> > >>>I disagree strongly with this. I think that Enchant is a great idea. > >>>Enchant isn't being utilized properly ATM, but it has the propensity to > >>>be a great leap forward in i18n spell-checking. > >> > >>What's your best suggest then? Force Enchant to compile with Aspell > >>support? This is the way that I will allow Enchant to be default. It > >>doesn't make any sense to have something that will not work by default. > >>I > >>think, it's important to have the default that is just work. > > > >Enchant should theoretically work fine without aspell support. But, I > >think that Enchant should be enabled by defaultm, and should work > >out-of-the-box, by whatever means necessary. > > Do you mean, you think we should change Enchant port to compile with > Aspell support? If no, then I will not switch Aspell to Enchant for the > default spell, unless you have anything to fix it. >> end of "Re: Need feedback/review, a big change in AbiWord2 port." from Jeremy Messenger << Yes. If Enchant needs aspell support for AbiWord2 to work best, then Enchant should depend upon aspell by default. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx