From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:58:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3F3106566C; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201B38FC14; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D806346B2C; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:58:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FAB68A009; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:58:29 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Dimitry Andric Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:54:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20101102; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201101042051.p04KpSGk054564@svn.freebsd.org> <201101051508.40337.jhb@freebsd.org> <4D24D4C5.2020903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D24D4C5.2020903@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101051554.29814.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:58:29 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexander Best , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r216977 - in head/libexec/rtld-elf: amd64 i386 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:58:31 -0000 On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:29:57 pm Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-01-05 21:08, John Baldwin wrote: > > My suggestion was that we ask clang to add a '-mno-whatever' and hopefully we > > could convince gcc to follow suit. clang developers seem to be fairly > > receptive, so I was hoping one of our clang liaisons could suggest it. :) > > These options already exist, e.g -mno-sse -mno-sse2 and so on. The > semantics of -mno-everything would be a bit hard to predict, especially > with new instruction sets coming out all the time. :) That's actually the point. I would want the compiler to automatically add new register set options to -mno-everything when it grew support for them so we don't have to frob the Makefiles every time. -- John Baldwin