Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:59:33 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        attilio@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r243515 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <50CD9B85.1040404@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndAsjZSK9XGFhHvdcD5135Xo4acybPDtZ0J9jXeAMpH5%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201211251422.qAPEM8BV074656@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndCGe=DtqKxRe0YXV0GJrf4CV6MX9B1MR-Uyy6A3hpongA@mail.gmail.com> <50C9B525.2060503@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-FndAsjZSK9XGFhHvdcD5135Xo4acybPDtZ0J9jXeAMpH5%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 13/12/2012 22:17 Attilio Rao said the following:
> Right, but as I said, for the time being we can at least have a
> correct panic() semantic and take the right time to fix the
> generic_stop_cpus() and then absorb also the panic() fix into it.
> Right now the mechanism is still broken in panic and it can be fixed
> with a very easy fix, so we should just do it.
> This will also help vendors like Sandvine which may have hit just this bug too.


Perhaps I got confused...
Could you please re-explain to me your suggestion to fix panic(9)?
Because I thought that it would require exactly the same steps as fixing
generic_stop_cpus().  Sorry about this.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50CD9B85.1040404>