From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jan 5 14: 4:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from kronos.alcnet.com (kronos.alcnet.com [63.69.28.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E752115483 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) X-Provider: ALC Communications, Inc. http://www.alcnet.com/ Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by kronos.alcnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/antispam) with ESMTP id RAA69655; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:04:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Kelly Yancey X-Sender: kbyanc@kronos.alcnet.com To: Matthew Jacob Cc: Wes Bauske , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/15611: EIDE Large Disk Support, Newfs problem, File systemcorruption,IBM-DPTA-353750 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > I don't think a 4.0 kernel on to of 3.x works very well- probably does, > but why stretch it? I have no idea about the upgrade path- I just do a > forklift upgrade myself. It won't work. 4.0 has undergone some much-needed restructuring with regards to it's signal implementation. Upgrading from 3.x has, as a result, become the topic of much debate on the -current mailing list. But it is sufficient to say that a 4.0 kernel and 3.x world will not mix. Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Richmond, VA Analyst / E-business Development, Bell Industries http://www.bellind.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message