From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 13 12: 8:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com (imo-r05.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972EE37B409 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id n.134.3014468 (4242) for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 15:08:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Bsdguru@aol.com Message-ID: <134.3014468.28f9eb43@aol.com> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 15:08:51 EDT Subject: Re: 4-port T1 PCI card with integrated csu/dsu To: hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In a message dated 10/13/2001 2:51:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time, phk@critter.freebsd.dk writes: > >> sbei.com has single-port PCI cards with on-board csu/dsu. I could run 4 > >or > >> 6 of those. and they support FreeBSD. > > They also have a 4 port card which is supported by FreeBSD (but discontinued) > > and a new card which could trivially be modified to run under FreeBSDs > driver, but so far they have not sent me a card... > > etinc is not recommendable. > Everyone knows that PHK has a grudge against etinc. How childish. Their stuff is so superior to what stock freebsd has. One company i worked for has 2 T3s load balanced and its doing traffic prioritization of 20K pps on average with their integrated bandwidth manager. Its been up for months. Lanmedia gear was choking on 1 T3 in the same machine. dennis can be brusk, but he knows WAN better than anyone I've ever worked with or for. Bryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message