From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 03:38:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE7A16A4DE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from deliver.epitech.net (deliver.epitech.net [163.5.0.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 338DD43D3F for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:38:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from epibug@epita.fr) Received: from epita.fr ([10.42.1.60]) by deliver.epitech.net (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004020512360902264 ; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:36:09 +0100 Received: from sleepo (sleepo.epita.fr [10.42.14.30]) by epita.fr id i15Bbv613186 Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:38:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:37:57 +0100 From: epi bug To: Fred Clift Message-ID: <20040205113757.GA11210@sleepo.epita.fr> References: <20040203091203.S91207@irfcn.qzm.berz.irevb.arg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040203091203.S91207@irfcn.qzm.berz.irevb.arg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 05:16:50 -0800 cc: Hackers cc: slick Subject: Re: My new fdisk(8) program. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:38:11 -0000 > Oh, just curious, why are you opposed to the use of structs? Does it make > the code less portable due to alignment restrictions or something? > > Fred to quote him: "structures are not portable" -- epibug - EPIT{A,ECH} *BSD User Group l'asso des codeurs qui aiment les systemes BSD :) http://assos.epita.fr/~epibug